Monday, August 14, 2017

WALKING BARE FOOT The Ultimate Antioxidant: Fight Premature Aging for Free


WALKING BARE FOOT The Ultimate Antioxidant: Fight Premature Aging for Free

Story at-a-glance

  • Modern rubber and plastic-soled shoes act as electrical insulators and therefore block the beneficial flow of electrons from the earth to your body.
  • Studies have shown that earthing or grounding improves blood viscosity, heart rate variability, inflammation, cortisol dynamics, sleep, autonomic nervous system (ANS) balance, and reduces effects of stress.
  • Earthing decreases the effect of these potentially disruptive electromagnetic fields.
  • A Body Voltage Meter can determine how much electricity is induced when lying in bed or sitting in a chair, and how much the electric charge is reduced by grounding.

Grounding May Be the Missing Link to Getting Healthy

Earthing may be one of the most important overlooked factors in public health. When grounding is restored, many people report significant improvement in a wide range of ailments, including chronic fatigue.
These changes are rapid and often occur within 30 minutes.
To date all of the individuals who reported that they had inflammatory issues have benefited from Earthing. This includes people with various severe autoimmune diseases. Note that we do not assert that Earthing is a "treatment" or a "cure" for any disease or disorder. Instead, it can be said without any equivocation that the human body evolved in contact with the Earth and needs to maintain this natural contact in order to function properly.

When you provide your body a constant source of free electrons, through diet or grounding you help to radically reduce inflammation which is widely acknowledged as one of the primary factors contributing to premature aging and chronic disease.

Monday, August 7, 2017

The breath taking speech of Israel Prime minister Nethanyahu


People are crying when they read this: Glory to YAHUWAH



Let's read together
Mr. Nethanyahu said:
Only 70 years ago! The Jews were taken to slaughter like sheep.
> 60 years ago!
> no country. No Army.
Seven Arab countries declared war on the small Jewish state, only a few hours after its creation!
> we were 650 Jews against the rest of the Arab world!
NO IDF (Israel Defense Army).
No powerful air force, only brave people with nowhere to go.
> Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia
> all attacked at the same time.
> the country that the United Nations gave us was a 65 % desert.
> the country is out of nowhere!
> 35 years ago! We fought the three armies most
> Powerful in the middle east, and we swept them in six days.
We fought against various coalitions of Arab countries, which had modern armies and many Soviet weapons, and we have always beaten them!
Today we have:
> a country,
> an army,
> a powerful air force,
> A State-of-the-Art Economy, which exports millions of dollars.
> Intel - Microsoft - ibm develops products at home.
> our doctors receive awards for medical research.
> we make the desert bloom, and sell oranges, flowers and vegetables all over the world.
> Israel has sent its own satellites into space!
> three satellites at the same time!
> We are proud to be at the same rank as:
> The United States, which has 250 million inhabitants,
> Russia, which has 200 million inhabitants,
> China, which has 1.3 billion inhabitants;
> Europeans - France, Great Britain, Germany - with 350 million inhabitants.
> the only countries in the world to send objects into space!
> Israel is now part of the family of the nuclear powers,
> with the United States, Russia, China, India, France, and
> Great Britain.
> (we have never officially admitted it, but everyone knows it)
> and say that only 60 years ago,
> we were LED, ashamed and hopeless, to slaughter!
> we have extirpés the smoking ruins of Europe,
> we have won our wars here with less than nothing
> we built our little "Empire" from nothing.
Who's Hamas to scare me?
> to terrify me?
> you make me laugh!
> Passover was celebrated;
> Let's not forget what this is about.
> we survived Pharaoh,
> we survived the Greeks,
> we survived the Romans,
> we survived the inquisition in Spain,
> we have the pogroms in Russia,
> we survived Hitler,
> we survived the Germans,
> we survived the Holocaust,
> we survived the armies of seven Arab countries,
> we survived saddam.
> we will survive the enemies present
Think of any time in human history!
Think about it, for us, the Jewish people,
> the situation has never been better!
> then let's face the world,
Let us remember:
> all nations or cultures
> who once tried to destroy us,
> no longer exist today - while we still live!
> Egypt?
> the Greeks?
> Alexander of Macedonia?
> the Romans? (does anyone still speak Latin these days? )
> The Third Reich?
> and look at us,
> The Bible Nation,
> The slaves of Egypt,
> We are still here,
And we speak the same language!
> then, and now!
> Arabs don't know yet,
> but they will learn that there is a God.
> as long as we keep our identity, we are forever.
So forgive us for not worrying,
> not to cry,
> not to be afraid.
> things are fine here.
> they could certainly get better,
However:
> Don't believe the media,
> they don't tell you
> parties continue to take place,
> people continue to live,
> people keep coming out,
> people continue to see friends.
Yes, our morale is low.
> so what?
Only because we mourn our deaths while others rejoice in the blood shed.
> that is why we will win, in the end.
Never sleep or sleep the guardian of Israel! Yahweh God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Forward this speech to the whole community,
> and to people around the world.
> they are part of our strength

Saturday, August 5, 2017

Archaeological find in Jerusalem

'Proves Bible passage is historically true'

Archaeologists excavating in Jerusalem have found burned artifacts dating from 2,600 years ago – which prove that a passage in the Bible is true.
Researchers uncovered charred wood, grape seeds, fish scales, bones and pottery while digging in the City of David in Jerusalem.
The find provides evidence that the Babylonians ‘burned all the houses of Jerusalem’, described in the book of Jeremiah.
Researchers from the Israel Antiquities Authority found the artifacts beneath layers of rock in the City of David – along with jars with seals which enabled the researchers to date the artifacts.
‘These seals are characteristic of the end of the First Temple Period,’ said Dr Joe Uziel of the Israel Antiquities Authority, ‘Used for the administrative system that developed towards the end of the Judean dynasty.’
The fire damage can be dated to 2,600 years ago – which ties with events described in the Bible.

 Evidence of Babylonian Destruction of Jerusalem Found at the City of David



The book of Jeremiah says, ‘Now on the seventh day of the fifth month, which was the nineteenth year of King Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard, a servant of the king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem. He burned the house of the Lord, the king’s house, and all the houses of Jerusalem; even every great house he burned with fire.’


Source: https://ph.news.yahoo.com/archaeological-find-jerusalem-proves-bible-passage-historically-true-123315016.html?hl=1&noRedirect=1




Saturday, March 18, 2017

Get Paid with your opinion

The online paid survey that earns you a passive income at home and anywhere. Without any obligation on the membership. Online paid survey does get you rich quickly, but it is just a passive income just to sustain your personal necessities like, phone loads, extra shopping money and many more. 

Join survey panelist,

Survey Panel?

Survey panels are run by survey companies, most of them are market research  companies whose main aim is to collect data from the users and use it for research, product development  or marketing purposes.

In order to earn some money from this survey panel you need to sign up the panel will send you survey request via email

Your job is to complete these surveys  within the given time frame.

Surveys will mostly cover questions related to products  and services.

Sometimes they will even ask you questions related to your lifestyle, such as the city in which you live, how much time you watch movies in a month and so on.

The completion time of each survey may last from  1 minute to 30 minutes.

IF YOU LOVE TO GIVE HONEST OPINIONS

WELL YOU CAN CLICK BELOW LINKS TO TRY YOUR INNOVATING IDEAS THAT PAYS YOU AT HOME

1. YouGov
2. Panel Place
3. View Fruit

Please be get informed to get back to this blog as I update the links above for the additional surveys that you may gain on.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

The Talla Hacienda

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-11274            March 29, 1916
RAFAELA DALMACIO, petitioner,
vs.
ALBERTO BARRETTO, THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, and THE SHERIFF OF THE PROVINCE OF RIZAL, respondents.
Ramon Mañalac and Eugenio Testa for petitioner.
Attorney-General Avanceña for respondents.
TORRES, J.:
On October 15, 1915, counsel for Rafaela Dalmacio commenced these certiorari proceedings, praying that a judgment be rendered declaring the order of ejectment decreed by the judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal to be null and void, without prejudice to an order being issued to the sheriff of said province directing him to refrain from ejecting the petitioner and her caretaker, Eugenio Testa, from the parcels of land she was occupying as lessee. Petitioner further prayed that said court be directed to furnish a transcript of the evidence adduced in the proceedings aforementioned. In connection with this petition counsel alleged that since the time of the previous sovereignty plaintiff had been a lessee of certain parcels of land situated on the Tala hacienda in the municipality of Caloocan, formerly owned by the friars; that this fact was recorded in the Bureau of Lands in 1905, on account of plaintiff's being entitled to the benefits conferred by Act No. 1120 of the Philippine Commission; that at the time of the survey and parceling of the said estate by the bureau aforementioned, it notified petitioner that the numbers 859 and 861 had been assigned to the parcels of land she was leasing. Petitioner further stated that on being advised to sign the contract of sale of said lots Nos. 859 and 861 to her, she petitioned the Bureau of Lands to order the two lots she was occupying to be identified; that as a result thereof it was ascertained that said lots were situated in different places and were other than the parcels occupied and leased by petitioner; that notwithstanding this the Director of Lands insisted on selling to petitioner the lots Nos. 859 and 861, which were formerly uncultivated lands; that as these parcels were not those she had under lease, she refused to buy them; but that the Director of Lands, arbitrarily, by himself and on his own responsibility, cancelled her contract of lease, notwithstanding her protest, wherefore she was obliged to bring an action against said Director of Lands in the Court of First Instance of Rizal, to validate her right of preference to acquire the lands she was actually occupying, which action had not yet been heard; that at this stage of the proceedings the Director of Lands in case No. 6563, brought in the Court of Land Registration and now pending in the court of the Province of Rizal, sought to secure the ejectment of the caretaker and tenants-on-shares of the plaintiff from the lands she was occupying as lessee; that said petition was granted by the court in open extra limitation of its powers, for plaintiff did not deny, but actually recognized the Government's ownership of said estate and of the parts thereof which she held under lease, notwithstanding all of which her motion for a rehearing was denied.
The Attorney-General, in answer to the aforementioned complaint, alleges that it does not set forth facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of a writ of certiorari; that in order that Supreme Court may review proceedings by writ of certiorari, it must be proven that the lower court acted in excess of its jurisdiction and that there is no appeal nor any other easy, speedy and adequate remedy available; that if, as alleged, the Director of Lands obtained from the Court of Land Registration, in case No. 6563, title to said hacienda, of which the lots occupied by the petitioner form a part, it is unquestionable that under section 3 of Act No. 1680 he is entitled to a writ of possession for said estate and the lots occupied by petitioner, and that it is immaterial whether or not she has a preferred right to purchase the parcels from which she is to be ejected, because the Court of First Instance has a right to order that the Director of Lands, against whom the petitioner has brought these proceedings now pending be placed in possession of said parcels.
In his brief counsel for the plaintiff maintained that no appeal lies from an order of ejectment issued in land registration proceedings and therefore the easiest and most expeditious remedy is that of certiorari; that, in accordance with section 17 [section 3] of Act No. 1680, the Court of First Instance, at the request of the Director of Lands, may issue a writ of possession against the objector who refused to comply with an order of the Land Court issued in a final judgment, which provisions, however, was not applicable to petitioner, who could not be deprived of the possession of the lands leased by her, except by due process of law. In a supplementary brief the Attorney-General alleged that, a motion having been filed to determine whether or not the Director of Lands was entitled to a writ of possession in said proceedings in the Court of Land Registration, the lower court denied the said motion and no appeal from this ruling having been taken by the plaintiff it had therefore become res judicata. But petitioner alleged that the order dictated by the Court of First Instance of Rizal in case No. 1265 is merely interlocutory and discretional; that consequently it is not appealable, and cannot become final until the litigation has been decided on the merits.
While the proceedings brought by the plaintiff Rafaela Dalmacio in the Court of First Instance of Rizal against the Director of Lands to determine whether or not she has a preferred right to acquire by purchase the two lots of land she has been occupying as lessee were pending, the said court could not, in justice and strict right in case No. 6563, heard by the Court of Land Registration and now pending before him, order the ejectment of the plaintiff and her caretaker, from the two parcels leased by her, for, as such lessee, she may have a preferential right over any other person to purchase them from the Government. Unless the plaintiff should fail to comply with the conditions prescribed by the laws governing this matter, she has an indisputable right to be secured in her possession of the two parcels of land she occupies until such time as her action now pending against the Director of Lands, relative to the said right of preference and the identify of the land she has been occupying as lessee, has been finally determined.
When, on petition of the Director of Lands and notwithstanding that the proceedings aforementioned were pending, the court decreed the dispossession and ejectment of the plaintiff, in order that she vacate and leave free the two parcels of land she has been occupying as lessee, it unquestionably exceeded its jurisdiction, for, if the ejectment of the plaintiff were carried into effect and she were thus prevented from continuing in her possession of the two parcels of land she holds under lease, it would be a pre-judgment of the suit pending against the Director of Lands, because the decree of ejectment, in violation of the law that protects plaintiff's right as such lessee, determines that she has absolutely no right to preference in the purchase of the and she occupies.
For the foregoing reasons, the order dictated by the Court of First Instance of Rizal on December 22, 1914, is held to be null, void and of no value or effect, in so far as it decrees that the plaintiff Rafaela Dalmacio be ejected from the two parcels of land to which it refers, and the preliminary injunction issued by this court is hereby made final until the action prosecuted by the plaintiff to secure the right of preference is finally decided. So ordered.
Johnson, Trent, and Araullo, JJ., concur.

Separate Opinions
MORELAND, J., concurring:
I agree that, in view of all the circumstances disclosed by the record, the trial judge exceeded his jurisdiction, and that the writ of certiorari prayed for should issue.

Source; http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1916/mar1916/gr_l-11274_1916.html

The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation